The president refused to talk with them and they dispersed when Rutgers threatened to arrest them. On April 28, some 50 students staged a sit-in at the Rutgers president’s office. The Rutgers administration held firm, Rice kept quiet. Student and faculty objections to Rice started in February and continued to grow for months. Rutgers University invited Rice to speak (for $35,000 and an honorary degree) and Smith College invited Lagarde (compensation undisclosed). And now they have another quality in common, cowardice under fire, albeit only verbal fire after they were invited to speak at college commencements. He American Condoleezza Rice, 60, Iraq War architect, and the French Christine Lagarde, 58, International Monetary Fund managing director, have little in common beyond being women of power who have contributed to the misery of millions of people they never cared to meet. What would you expect from powerful people, personal courage? When is a Republican in Trenton going to grow a pair and raise the issue of defunding this nightmare?Īnd I say that as an alumnus of the RU system, by the way, who’s sick and tired of watching Rutgers University’s continued slide into lawlessness and madness, straying further all the time from its core educational mission.Condi Rice, Christine Lagarde: Cowardice at Commencementīy William Boardman, Reader Supported News Take it from a student loan paying American. Would the students receiving Barchi’s email feel quite as bullish about his politicking on the other side of their degrees? When Sallie Mae comes calling? And the cost of subsidizing this nonsense comes home to roost?ĭoubtful. Rutgers receives hundreds of millions annually from Trenton and, as I’ve complained before, uses that cash to push a radical political agenda and subsidize tuition for plenty of people who are not (to borrow a favorite liberal phrase) “paying their fair share.” Our legislation continues to provide legal status to them for three years as Congress seeks a permanent solution.”ĭon’t make the mistake of thinking RU’s involvement here is motivated by altruistic (albeit badly misguided) liberal ideology. “However, I do not believe we should pull the rug out and push these young men and women - who came out of the shadows and registered with the federal government - back into the darkness. “In my view, the DACA Executive Order issued by President Obama was unconstitutional and President-elect Trump would be right to repeal it,” Graham asserted at the time of introduction. “If you feel strongly about this issue, I encourage you to follow the directions below to send an automatic letter to your US Senators and your member in the House of Representatives.”Īsk Uncle Sam to help non-citizens break the law and recoup more of your hard-working parents’ cash!Ī little quick background: the Bridge Act was introduced by both Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Dick Durbin (D-IL), also in December, to provide for a “provisional protected presence” for the individuals implicated by former President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). This legislation would provide those protections,” Barchi said in his latest e-mail blast. “Many students at the University have called for protections for undocumented students. Rutgers students attend a legislative committee hearing in February 2012. Well, on Tuesday, Barchi took it to the next level and came out in favor of the so-called Bridge Act.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |